http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVpqFjd2Sg8#normal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBAT07UEWug&NR=1
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Millions Spent On GPS Tracking Devices For Parolees Wasted As State Of California Is Unable To Keep Up With Generated Alerts – 10′s Of Thousands Sex Offender Alerts Ignored
http://ourtaxdollarsatwork.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/millions-spent-on-gps-tracking-devices-for-parolees-wasted-as-state-of-california-is-unable-to-keep-up-with-generated-alerts-10s-of-thousands-sex-offender-alerts-ignored/
CALIFORNIA – Tens of thousands of electronic alerts caused by sex offender missteps have gone unresolved, a situation that the state is trying to correct this week with a massive push to get the backlog under control.
Parole supervisors are following up on more than 31,000 alarms in Southern California, caused by low batteries, lost signals, entry into forbidden zones or severed straps on electronic ankle bracelets.
Parole administrators got their orders June 3, the day after a state inspector general’s report found lax GPS supervision of paroled sex offender John Albert Gardner III, who went on to kill two San Diego County teenagers.
The backlog has developed since March 19, when the department committed to resolve “all alerts and violations” by sex offenders, in response to the Gardner case.
Officials say the backlog grew because they lacked software to run an ongoing report of all unresolved cases. That is, supervisors in Southern California were working only with reports of new alarms, rather than a report showing previous alarms that had not been cleared.
The retroactive reports have been available for the past week, revealing the backlog, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokesman Gordon Hinkle said.
“We have stated several times that GPS is an evolving science, where technology and best practices continue to be fluid,” Hinkle said by e-mail. “This is a new policy, and as CDCR leads the nation in GPS development, more improvements will be made.”
Agents and union leaders complain that the new emphasis on GPS monitoring by computer keeps them from performing important work in the field, where they can more effectively track dangerous offenders.
“This policy has created so much busy work that this work cannot get done,” said Melinda Silva, the Parole Agents Association of California president. “The real work of getting out and supervising these people is not getting done.”
Hinkle said the department is reviewing workloads for agents handling GPS cases. Clearing the backlog will help, he said.
“Once this reconciliation process is cleared, case management will become more manageable,” he said.
GPS monitoring can be a powerful tool, judging by the report this month by the state’s independent inspector general, David Shaw. He concluded that Amber Dubois, 14, of Escondido and Chelsea King, 17, of Poway would likely still be alive if agents had done a better job watching Gardner, who served five years in prison and three years on parole for a 2000 molestation conviction.
Among other mistakes, agents failed to check Gardner’s GPS tracks, which showed he broke curfew at least 168 times and visited remote areas near where he later hid Amber’s remains, the report found. GPS data also show he visited a state prison, which could be a felony. GPS data from 2008 show he parked in an area where officials say contraband is smuggled into the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility on Otay Mesa Road.
A spokeswoman for Shaw said Monday she could not address the unresolved alerts without seeing documentation, but noted the review included proposals to improve monitoring of sex offenders.
“As we said in our report, the Office of the Inspector General recommended strategies that could allow the (corrections) department to more effectively review and use GPS data,” spokeswoman Laura Hill said.
According to records obtained by The San Diego Union-Tribune, unresolved alerts totaled more than 31,000 in Region III, which is Los Angeles , and Region IV, which includes counties from San Bernardino to the border with Mexico.
The problem grew so severe that administrators and unit supervisors held a special meeting last week at Region IV headquarters in Diamond Bar.
New reports documenting alerts will be developed every week by the company that supplies the GPS anklets, administrators wrote, in part because “the district management report is inaccurate.”
The alerts listed on more than a dozen pages of internal documents range from simple low-battery warnings to so-called strap tampers, when a parolee cuts off the buckle and removes the tracking system.
GPS devices need to be charged every 12 hours, creating a challenge for homeless parolees who lack a steady source of electricity.
Records also show thousands of inclusion- and exclusion-zone alarms, when parolees enter or leave restricted areas, as well as “message gaps” and “no GPS” cases, when signals are lost for some period of time.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said most alerts are inconsequentia l, like low-battery signals or exclusion-zone warnings when a parolee drives past a school or park.
“What (agents) are going to do is gloss over a lot of them because they know what they are,” she said. “Hopefully there are some that catch their attention and get them to say, ‘Hmmm, we need to take a closer look at this one.’ ”
California spends about $60 million a year tracking 7,000 or so convicted sex offenders with GPS systems.
Nonetheless, the technology’s effectiveness has been questioned by agents, lawmakers and criminal-justice experts because parole officials place so much emphasis on where parolees go rather than what they do.
Retired parole supervisor Rebecca Hernandez said she relied on lower-paid staff to monitor GPS tracks when she oversaw a sex-offenders unit in Huntington Park.
“Interns were awesome in a lot of the stuff they could do, which freed up the agents,” said Hernandez, who retired in January after collecting a $900,000 settlement to a discrimination claim she filed against the department. “As long as you don’t give them personal data, it’s fine.”
Keeping sworn peace officers indoors to read GPS data and constantly respond to GPS alerts is not the best use of the agents’ time, Hernandez said.
“You’re putting community safety at risk,” she said. “It means you’re telling agents not to go out in the field and monitor these parolees.”
Silva said the department took the unusual step last week of approving overtime so agents could resolve the alarms quickly. Even so, her members are overwhelmed with the workload, she said.
“They’re tired. They’re burned,” Silva said. “Most people aren’t about the overtime. They want to do a good job and go home at the end of the day.”
CALIFORNIA – Tens of thousands of electronic alerts caused by sex offender missteps have gone unresolved, a situation that the state is trying to correct this week with a massive push to get the backlog under control.
Parole supervisors are following up on more than 31,000 alarms in Southern California, caused by low batteries, lost signals, entry into forbidden zones or severed straps on electronic ankle bracelets.
Parole administrators got their orders June 3, the day after a state inspector general’s report found lax GPS supervision of paroled sex offender John Albert Gardner III, who went on to kill two San Diego County teenagers.
The backlog has developed since March 19, when the department committed to resolve “all alerts and violations” by sex offenders, in response to the Gardner case.
Officials say the backlog grew because they lacked software to run an ongoing report of all unresolved cases. That is, supervisors in Southern California were working only with reports of new alarms, rather than a report showing previous alarms that had not been cleared.
The retroactive reports have been available for the past week, revealing the backlog, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokesman Gordon Hinkle said.
“We have stated several times that GPS is an evolving science, where technology and best practices continue to be fluid,” Hinkle said by e-mail. “This is a new policy, and as CDCR leads the nation in GPS development, more improvements will be made.”
Agents and union leaders complain that the new emphasis on GPS monitoring by computer keeps them from performing important work in the field, where they can more effectively track dangerous offenders.
“This policy has created so much busy work that this work cannot get done,” said Melinda Silva, the Parole Agents Association of California president. “The real work of getting out and supervising these people is not getting done.”
Hinkle said the department is reviewing workloads for agents handling GPS cases. Clearing the backlog will help, he said.
“Once this reconciliation process is cleared, case management will become more manageable,” he said.
GPS monitoring can be a powerful tool, judging by the report this month by the state’s independent inspector general, David Shaw. He concluded that Amber Dubois, 14, of Escondido and Chelsea King, 17, of Poway would likely still be alive if agents had done a better job watching Gardner, who served five years in prison and three years on parole for a 2000 molestation conviction.
Among other mistakes, agents failed to check Gardner’s GPS tracks, which showed he broke curfew at least 168 times and visited remote areas near where he later hid Amber’s remains, the report found. GPS data also show he visited a state prison, which could be a felony. GPS data from 2008 show he parked in an area where officials say contraband is smuggled into the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility on Otay Mesa Road.
A spokeswoman for Shaw said Monday she could not address the unresolved alerts without seeing documentation, but noted the review included proposals to improve monitoring of sex offenders.
“As we said in our report, the Office of the Inspector General recommended strategies that could allow the (corrections) department to more effectively review and use GPS data,” spokeswoman Laura Hill said.
According to records obtained by The San Diego Union-Tribune, unresolved alerts totaled more than 31,000 in Region III, which is Los Angeles , and Region IV, which includes counties from San Bernardino to the border with Mexico.
The problem grew so severe that administrators and unit supervisors held a special meeting last week at Region IV headquarters in Diamond Bar.
New reports documenting alerts will be developed every week by the company that supplies the GPS anklets, administrators wrote, in part because “the district management report is inaccurate.”
The alerts listed on more than a dozen pages of internal documents range from simple low-battery warnings to so-called strap tampers, when a parolee cuts off the buckle and removes the tracking system.
GPS devices need to be charged every 12 hours, creating a challenge for homeless parolees who lack a steady source of electricity.
Records also show thousands of inclusion- and exclusion-zone alarms, when parolees enter or leave restricted areas, as well as “message gaps” and “no GPS” cases, when signals are lost for some period of time.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said most alerts are inconsequentia l, like low-battery signals or exclusion-zone warnings when a parolee drives past a school or park.
“What (agents) are going to do is gloss over a lot of them because they know what they are,” she said. “Hopefully there are some that catch their attention and get them to say, ‘Hmmm, we need to take a closer look at this one.’ ”
California spends about $60 million a year tracking 7,000 or so convicted sex offenders with GPS systems.
Nonetheless, the technology’s effectiveness has been questioned by agents, lawmakers and criminal-justice experts because parole officials place so much emphasis on where parolees go rather than what they do.
Retired parole supervisor Rebecca Hernandez said she relied on lower-paid staff to monitor GPS tracks when she oversaw a sex-offenders unit in Huntington Park.
“Interns were awesome in a lot of the stuff they could do, which freed up the agents,” said Hernandez, who retired in January after collecting a $900,000 settlement to a discrimination claim she filed against the department. “As long as you don’t give them personal data, it’s fine.”
Keeping sworn peace officers indoors to read GPS data and constantly respond to GPS alerts is not the best use of the agents’ time, Hernandez said.
“You’re putting community safety at risk,” she said. “It means you’re telling agents not to go out in the field and monitor these parolees.”
Silva said the department took the unusual step last week of approving overtime so agents could resolve the alarms quickly. Even so, her members are overwhelmed with the workload, she said.
“They’re tired. They’re burned,” Silva said. “Most people aren’t about the overtime. They want to do a good job and go home at the end of the day.”
Sex Offenders After Prison: Lifetime GPS Monitoring?
By Kamika Dunlap
Following their release from prison, sex offenders are already required by law to register or notify local law enforcement.
In addition, many are required to wear a GPS (Global Positioning System) or an electronic monitoring device which tells law enforcement officials the exact location of the offender 24 hours a day.
The length of time sex offenders are assigned to electronic monitoring varies from state to state. It can be months, years and in some cases a lifetime.
So, why do some states require lifetime GPS monitoring of some sex offenders?
In addition, many are required to wear a GPS (Global Positioning System) or an electronic monitoring device which tells law enforcement officials the exact location of the offender 24 hours a day.
The length of time sex offenders are assigned to electronic monitoring varies from state to state. It can be months, years and in some cases a lifetime.
So, why do some states require lifetime GPS monitoring of some sex offenders?
Lifetime GPS monitoring is typically assigned to high-risk offenders and evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In general, people who commit sex offenses against children are often required to wear lifetime GPS monitoring after serving time.
For example, in Oklahoma the law also requires habitual sex offenders to wear GPS monitoring devices for the rest of their lives.
How do GPS monitoring devices work?
People on the tracking system must wear the electronic waterproof ankle bands at all times and stay within a certain distance from their separate GPS transmitters, which can be carried on belts, in purses or set down on desks and tables when at work or home.
Several states, including Florida, Missouri, Ohio, Illinois Oklahoma and California (Prop. 83), have laws which require certain high risk child and violent sex offenders to be monitored through GPS devices for the remainder of their life.
The lifetime electronic monitoring has raised questions not only about whether the penalty is too harsh but if the price tag is too expensive.
Some say offenders should not have to endure lifetime monitoring after “paying their debt” to society and serving their sentences. In addition, ankle monitors are too uncomfortable for the offender to wear daily on a long term basis, such as in a lifetime.
Currently, lawmakers in Iowa are reconsidering the state’s law requiring lifetime supervison for sex offenders. A panel recommended the state should revise its law due to scarce resources, focusing on the highest-risk offenders.
The results from Iowa’s experiment with lifetime monitoring of sex offenders would cost at the very minimum about $168 million over the next 20 years, the Des Moines Register reports.
Since Iowa’s law went into effect in 2006, the number of offenders under 10-year or lifetime monitoring has grown from six in 2007 to 113 by September of last year. By 2019, the number under 10-year supervision is expected to grow to 962, and the number under lifetime monitoring to 954, the panel said.
This post was mentioned on Twitter by IsaacBrant: FindLaw News: Sex Offenders After Prison: Lifetime GPS Monitoring? http://ow.ly/16tt8L Read More
For example, in Oklahoma the law also requires habitual sex offenders to wear GPS monitoring devices for the rest of their lives.
How do GPS monitoring devices work?
People on the tracking system must wear the electronic waterproof ankle bands at all times and stay within a certain distance from their separate GPS transmitters, which can be carried on belts, in purses or set down on desks and tables when at work or home.
Several states, including Florida, Missouri, Ohio, Illinois Oklahoma and California (Prop. 83), have laws which require certain high risk child and violent sex offenders to be monitored through GPS devices for the remainder of their life.
The lifetime electronic monitoring has raised questions not only about whether the penalty is too harsh but if the price tag is too expensive.
Some say offenders should not have to endure lifetime monitoring after “paying their debt” to society and serving their sentences. In addition, ankle monitors are too uncomfortable for the offender to wear daily on a long term basis, such as in a lifetime.
Currently, lawmakers in Iowa are reconsidering the state’s law requiring lifetime supervison for sex offenders. A panel recommended the state should revise its law due to scarce resources, focusing on the highest-risk offenders.
The results from Iowa’s experiment with lifetime monitoring of sex offenders would cost at the very minimum about $168 million over the next 20 years, the Des Moines Register reports.
Since Iowa’s law went into effect in 2006, the number of offenders under 10-year or lifetime monitoring has grown from six in 2007 to 113 by September of last year. By 2019, the number under 10-year supervision is expected to grow to 962, and the number under lifetime monitoring to 954, the panel said.
This post was mentioned on Twitter by IsaacBrant: FindLaw News: Sex Offenders After Prison: Lifetime GPS Monitoring? http://ow.ly/16tt8L Read More
RSOL Resource Sites
If you have any sites that would be a good resource for RSO's please let me know, I will add them to my site
Thanks
Thanks
Virtual Death Sentence
•Allegan County Circuit Court Judge Kevin Cronin called a listing on the Sex Offender registry “equivalent to a death penalty” to a person’s reputation and career. “It’s a lifetime disability.”
•Judge William C. Buhl: When we have people married to their victims, with children that are a product of their crime, and they have to worry about whether they can go watch their kids’ soccer games at school, it just struck me as just wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)